|
Column Archive |
||
July, 2014 |
Co-writing Gone Bad |
by Webmaster |
|
There's something intangible and undefinable in music, in a song. It can't be seen, or heard, or touched, or quantified. It is more than the lyrics, more than the melody, more than the chords, more than the arrangement and production. It is the sum which is greater than the parts. I have had phenomenal experience with co-writing. Something magic happens when two people take a hook, a line or some partially (and even badly written) lyrics, and work together to make a song that is better than either one could have done alone. One writer inspires another, then they collaborate to reach heights. They trust each other enough to question what they have, regardless of whose idea, and to answer each other's questions. "If we change this word, is that meaning redundant with this other word?" "Does that change weaken or strengthen the line? The verse? The song?"
I've also had experiences where the result was less than stellar. Usually I get the idea and write some lyrics, then look for someone who wants to write music for my lyrics. This usually, but not always, results in lyric changes. I'm okay with that, as long as the changes are an improvement and the music enhances the lyrics. Prosody.
I find that I can feel where the melody needs to go up or down, when the song needs to speed up or slow down, how chord changes need to go to minor and back to major or create tension and resolve, when the production needs to be full and busy or be sparse with space to relax. I've been complemented by musicians I respect, who are also well respected by many others.
That's why it is so frustrating to work with a co-writer who does not understand prosody, who does not respect my opinions, who does not take my suggestions about rewriting. I am currently in various stages of co-writing a over a half-dozen songs with 6 co-writers. We don't always agree on everything, and sometimes I have to curb my ego and look at what's best for the song. Usually, time away from the song allows us to find a place where we can agree on what the song needs. A co-writer who takes a song out as-is, in spite of requests for changes, to get feedback to reinforce his position does not understand collaboration and is disrespectful of his co-writer and of the co-writing process. This is not the same as taking a song out for feedback to see what works and what needs to be fixed. I'm fully in favor of doing that. You bring the to-do list back to the co-writer to get the co-writer's take on it and you tackle the changes as needed. It's a back and forth discussion.
Today I had to say, "No." The changes my co-writer made to the song structure don't work. The music (tempo, rhythm, chords and melody) doesn't work. Yesterday a friend told me, "Be kind to him and be blunt. Anything else is leading him on." I gave myself a week to warm up to the song as is and literally found listening to it this morning painful. I would not perform or record that song. I didn't want to hurt his feelings but I don't want to keep trying to guide someone to a place he doesn't want to go. I have to respect my time and my creative spirit.
I've co-written. Other people have performed and recorded my songs, and changed words and arrangements. Up till now, I've been able to say, "No one has ever hurt one of my 'babies'." I can't say that anymore. Thanks for visiting AcousticByLines.com |
|||
Any questions? Thanks for visiting AcousticByLines.com! |
|||
TOP |
This site does not use cookies or keep your data. It is strictly informative. |